Problem clarity
The user, need, success criteria, constraints, and scope are understandable.
Every stage produces something reviewable. The sequence reduces confusion, keeps scope visible, and makes the final result easier to explain.
A seven-day prototype and a ninety-day product require different depth, but both benefit from clear scope, visible work, and an honest release.
Define the user, workflow, pain point, success criteria, constraints, risks, and non-goals before selecting features.
Plan the data, model behavior, interface, evaluation, tools, deployment, and a sequence of achievable milestones.
Build the smallest useful workflow first, then add capability in reviewable increments with visible version history.
Use feedback to improve decisions, code structure, user experience, testing, failure handling, and documentation.
Test expected behavior and edge cases, deploy the project, and state limitations instead of hiding them.
Explain the problem, architecture, evidence, trade-offs, result, and what you would change with more time.
This rubric guides feedback and project quality. The scheduled tenure certificate records participation in the program period; it does not assign a grade or certify mastery of every criterion.
The user, need, success criteria, constraints, and scope are understandable.
The main workflow runs and failure cases are not ignored.
Architecture and implementation choices can be explained.
Repository, documentation, deployment, and demonstration support the story.
Choose the program depth that fits your current experience and the project you want to ship.